Hunsberger v. Wood

583 F.3d 219, 2009 WL 2949033
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 18, 2009·No. 08-1782·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

In a poll requested by a member of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc, Judges Michael, Motz, King, and Gregory voted to rehear the case en banc. Chief Judge Trader and Judges Wilkinson, [220]*220Niemeyer, Shedd, and Duncan voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Agee did not participate in the decision of this case. As a majority of participating judges has voted against rehearing en banc and as the panel has voted to deny rehearing, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is hereby denied.

Judge Wilkinson wrote an opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. Judge Motz wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc. Entered for the court at the direction of Judge Wilkinson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunsberger v. Wood, 583 F.3d 219, 2009 WL 2949033 (4th Cir. 2009).

583 F.3d 219 (Hunsberger v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. Purnell
652 F.3d 524 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Hunsberger v. Wood
583 F.3d 219 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)