Hunnings v. Travelers Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.

S.D. Georgia

Hunnings v. Travelers Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided February 25, 2021·No. 4:19-cv-00151·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

PHILLIP BRADLEY HUNNINGS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:19-cev-151 v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER The Court has been advised by the parties that they have reached a settlement as to all claims in the above-captioned case and that they are working to finalize a formal settlement agreement and intend to file a stipulated dismissal with prejudice within thirty days. (Doc. 78.) Therefore, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action. See Heape v. Flanagan, No. 6:07-CV-12, 2008 WL 2439736 (S.D. Ga. June 9, 2008). Within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered, the parties—if they wish—may present a dismissal judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), incorporating the terms of their settlement, so the Court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. In the alternative, the parties may simply file a joint stipulation of dismissal. If the parties fail to file a dismissal (or, if necessary, move to reopen the case) within thirty (30) days, the Court will dismiss the case with prejudice. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). SO ORDERED, this 25th day of February, 2021.

f S ~ Lye R.STANBAKER— UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

PHILLIP BRADLEY HUNNINGS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:19-cev-151 v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER The Court has been advised by the parties that they have reached a settlement as to all claims in the above-captioned case and that they are working to finalize a formal settlement agreement and intend to file a stipulated dismissal with prejudice within thirty days. (Doc. 78.) Therefore, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action. See Heape v. Flanagan, No. 6:07-CV-12, 2008 WL 2439736 (S.D. Ga. June 9, 2008). Within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered, the parties—if they wish—may present a dismissal judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), incorporating the terms of their settlement, so the Court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. In the alternative, the parties may simply file a joint stipulation of dismissal. If the parties fail to file a dismissal (or, if necessary, move to reopen the case) within thirty (30) days, the Court will dismiss the case with prejudice. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). SO ORDERED, this 25th day of February, 2021.

f S ~ Lye R.STANBAKER— UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Hunnings v. Travelers Insurance Group Holdings, Inc., (S.D. Ga. 2021).

Pincite

Hunnings v. Travelers Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. (Hunnings v. Travelers Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related