Hunnicutt v. Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Hunnicutt v. Virginia Department of Corrections

115 F. App'x 148

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2004·No. No. 04-6592·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carnell Hunnicutt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hunnicutt v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr., CA-01-379-7 (W.D.Va. Mar. 19, 2004; Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carnell Hunnicutt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hunnicutt v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr., CA-01-379-7 (W.D.Va. Mar. 19, 2004; Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hunnicutt v. Virginia Department of Corrections, 115 F. App'x 148 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

115 F. App'x 148 (Hunnicutt v. Virginia Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related