Hunnicutt v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Hunnicutt v. United States

253 F. 556, 165 C.C.A. 226, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1575

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 18, 1918·No. No. 3222·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A reversal is sought because of alleged errors in parts of thé court’s charge to the jury. Tbe record fails to show that before the jury retired any exception was so made as to direct the court’s attention to either of the parts of its charge now complained of. The judgment is not .to be reversed because of rulings made in the course of the trial, of which complaint was not made to the court before the case went to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A reversal is sought because of alleged errors in parts of thé court’s charge to the jury. Tbe record fails to show that before the jury retired any exception was so made as to direct the court’s attention to either of the parts of its charge now complained of. The judgment is not .to be reversed because of rulings made in the course of the trial, of which complaint was not made to the court before the case went to the jury.

Hunnicutt v. United States, 253 F. 556, 165 C.C.A. 226, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1575 (5th Cir. 1918).

Pincite

253 F. 556 (Hunnicutt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.