Hunnicutt v. United States

253 F. 556, 165 C.C.A. 226, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1575
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 18, 1918
DocketNo. 3222
StatusPublished

This text of 253 F. 556 (Hunnicutt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunnicutt v. United States, 253 F. 556, 165 C.C.A. 226, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1575 (5th Cir. 1918).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A reversal is sought because of alleged errors in parts of thé court’s charge to the jury. Tbe record fails to show that before the jury retired any exception was so made as to direct the court’s attention to either of the parts of its charge now complained of. The judgment is not .to be reversed because of rulings made in the course of the trial, of which complaint was not made to the court before the case went to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 F. 556, 165 C.C.A. 226, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunnicutt-v-united-states-ca5-1918.