Hunnicutt v. State
153 S.W. 1198, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 711
Opinion
Appellant was prosecuted under an indictment containing three counts, but the court in his charge only submitted the second count, and, this charging an offense against the law, the court did not err in overruling the motion to quash the indictment. There being no statement of facts or bills of exception in the record, the motion for new trial presents no grounds we can review. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunnicutt v. State, 153 S.W. 1198, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 711 (Tex. 1913).
153 S.W. 1198 (Hunnicutt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.