Hunnicutt v. Sondervan

Fourth Circuit

Hunnicutt v. Sondervan

127 F. App'x 103

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 8, 2005·No. No, 05-6171·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carnell Hunnicutt appeals a district court order granting the Defendants summary judgment and dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-l(a) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and memorandum and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hunnicutt v. Maryland Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-2073-1AMD (D.Md. Jan. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carnell Hunnicutt appeals a district court order granting the Defendants summary judgment and dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-l(a) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and memorandum and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hunnicutt v. Maryland Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-2073-1AMD (D.Md. Jan. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hunnicutt v. Sondervan, 127 F. App'x 103 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

127 F. App'x 103 (Hunnicutt v. Sondervan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related