Hunnicutt v. Myers

39 P.3d 188, 333 Or. 334, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 68
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hunnicutt v. Myers. Read the opinion of the Court — 333 Or. 610
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided February 7, 2002·No. S49087 & S49087·Published

Opinion

*336 PER CURIAM

In this ballot title review proceeding, petitioners challenge the summary of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure, which the Secretary of State has denominated as Initiative Petition 131 (2002). We review the Attorney General’s certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(d). See ORS 250.085(5) (setting out standard of review of challenges to ballot titles).

We have considered petitioners’ argument and determine that it is not well taken. Accordingly, we certify to the Secretary of State the following ballot title for the proposed measure:

ESTABLISHES STATE PROGRAM TO PURCHASE “AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENTS” (DEFINED) ON LAND ZONED EXCLUSIVE FARM USE
RESULT OF “YES” VOTE: ‘Yes” vote authorizes the establishment of a state Farmland Heritage Program to purchase “agricultural conservation easements” (defined) on certain farm land zoned for exclusive farm use.
RESULT OF “NO” VOTE: “No” vote rejects the establishment of a state Farmland Heritage Program to purchase “agricultural conservation easements” (defined) on certain land zoned for exclusive farm use.
SUMMARY: Under current law, state or local governments may acquire conservation easements to protect certain land values, including availability for agricultural use. These easements are nonpossessory interests in land that impose restrictions on future uses in order to preserve its character. Measure establishes Farmland Heritage Program for state to purchase conservation easements at fair market value on land zoned for exclusive farm use on which no dwelling has been built. State and seller must both be willing, and owners must apply to be considered; measure lists nonexclusive factors for priority of acquisitions by state. Owners of selected properties must execute documents prohibiting future residential development, guaranteeing future use for agricultural purposes. Requires legislation to raise, appropriate at least $5 million annually for program. Other provisions.

*337 Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(11).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunnicutt v. Myers, 39 P.3d 188, 333 Or. 334, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 68 (Or. 2002).

39 P.3d 188 (Hunnicutt v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 250.035
Oregon § 250.035
§ 250.085
Oregon § 250.085