Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID
This text of Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID (Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
CHARLES LARRY HUNNICUTT, § #1667980, § PETITIONER, § § V. § CIVIL CASE NO. 3:24-CV-1231-E-BK § DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, § RESPONDENT. §
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1631.1 The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2024.
1 An order transferring a successive application to the court of appeals is not a final order requiring a certificate of appealability. See United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 688 (5th Cir. 2015); Brewer v. Stephens, 605 F. App’x 417 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunnicutt-v-director-tdcj-cid-txnd-2024.