Hunnewell v. Sanger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hunnewell v. Sanger

5 A.D.2d 765, 170 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 765 (Hunnewell v. Sanger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunnewell v. Sanger, 5 A.D.2d 765, 170 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

On a motion for substitution of attorneys, Special Term, on reargument, fixed the fees of the outgoing attorney, who had been retained on a contingent fee basis, at $50 to be paid before the surrender of papers plus a lien of 12½% of any recovery by compromise or judgment. The outgoing attorney claims that on the termination of his contract of retainer, he was entitled to be paid in quantum meruit and was not obligated to accept a lien fixed on a percentage of the recovery. The cases clearly support that position (Martucci v. Brooklyn Children’s Aid Soc., 284 N. Y. 408; Matter of Tillman, 259 N. Y. 133). Special Term, therefore, should have determined the reasonable value of the services rendered. Since the record contains sufficient data for a proper appraisal of the value of those services, there is no necessity for remitting the matter to an official referee. This court finds the value of the services to be $500. Order modified to the extent of fixing the amount of the lien of the outgoing attorney at $500 and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the appellant. Settle order.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On a motion for substitution of attorneys, Special Term, on reargument, fixed the fees of the outgoing attorney, who had been retained on a contingent fee basis, at $50 to be paid before the surrender of papers plus a lien of 12½% of any recovery by compromise or judgment. The outgoing attorney claims that on the termination of his contract of retainer, he was entitled to be paid in quantum meruit and was not obligated to accept a lien fixed on a percentage of the recovery. The cases clearly support that position (Martucci v. Brooklyn Children’s Aid Soc., 284 N. Y. 408; Matter of Tillman, 259 N. Y. 133). Special Term, therefore, should have determined the reasonable value of the services rendered. Since the record contains sufficient data for a proper appraisal of the value of those services, there is no necessity for remitting the matter to an official referee. This court finds the value of the services to be $500. Order modified to the extent of fixing the amount of the lien of the outgoing attorney at $500 and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the appellant. Settle order.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 765, 170 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunnewell-v-sanger-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack