Hunley's Exr'x v. Shuford

11 Ala. 203
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 11 Ala. 203 (Hunley's Exr'x v. Shuford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunley's Exr'x v. Shuford, 11 Ala. 203 (Ala. 1847).

Opinion

COLLIER, C. J.

The only question in this case is,'whether the commencement and“ continued prosecution of a suit, within eighteen months from the grant of letters testamentary, is a presentation of the claim within the meaning of the statute. By the writ, with the indorsement thereon, the defendant is informed of the nature of the demand, and that the plaintiff insists upon its payment. He could not be more effectually advertised of both these facts, if the claim was formally presented to him, and payment demanded. There is nothing in the statute which requires the institution of a suit against an executor or administrator, to be preceded by a positive demand, and certainly in point of practice it has never been deemed necessary. This view is in conformity to the ruling of the county court, and its judgment is consequently affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrett v. Fondren
80 So. 2d 243 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Ex Parte Wilkinson
126 So. 102 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Floyd v. Clayton
67 Ala. 265 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Fretwell v. McLemore
52 Ala. 124 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Malone v. Hundley
52 Ala. 147 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Rutherford's Adm'rs v. Br. Bank at Mobile
14 Ala. 92 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Ala. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunleys-exrx-v-shuford-ala-1847.