Hunley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hunley v. State

230 S.W.3d 657, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165, 2007 WL 2363486

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 21, 2007

DocketED 88264

StatusPublished

This text of 230 S.W.3d 657 (Hunley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunley v. State, 230 S.W.3d 657, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165, 2007 WL 2363486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sherwin Hunley (Movant) appeals from an order in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. In his sole point relied on, Movant contends that the motion court erred in denying Movant’s motion without a hearing because he alleged facts not refuted by the record that his counsel failed to perform as reasonably competent counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. *658 The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. Rules Crim. Proc.2000 unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI