Hunley v. Industrial Commission

533 P.2d 700, 23 Ariz. App. 392, 1975 Ariz. App. LEXIS 567
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hunley v. Industrial Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ariz. App. 176
Court of Appeals of Arizona·Decided April 10, 1975·No. No. 1 CA-IC 1081·Published

Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

STEVENS, Judge.

This Court filed its opinion in the above-entitled matter on 11 February 1975. 23 Ariz.App. 176, 531 P.2d 552. A timely motion for rehearing and response thereto have been filed. The motion correctly advises the Court that the cases of Mahan v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 14 Ariz.App. 535, 484 P.2d 1064 (1971), and Washburn v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 14 Ariz.App. 479, 484 P.2d 248 (1971), (23 Ariz.App. at 177, 531 P.2d at 553) do not support the principle of law for which they are cited. We acknowledge this error on our part. This does not affect the result.

The motion for rehearing is herewith denied.

NELSON, P. J., and WREN, J., concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunley v. Industrial Commission, 533 P.2d 700, 23 Ariz. App. 392, 1975 Ariz. App. LEXIS 567 (Ark. Ct. App. 1975).

533 P.2d 700 (Hunley v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mahan v. Industrial Commission
484 P.2d 1064 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1971)
Washburn v. Industrial Commission
484 P.2d 248 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1971)
Hunley v. Industrial Commission
531 P.2d 552 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1975)