Hungerford v. Thompson

1 Kirby 393
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 15, 1788·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The defendant’s setting his name to the blank on the back of the note, was, according to the nature of the transaction, and the course of business, an authority to the plaintiff to write over it a power of attorney, or an assignment with warranty, at his election; and the defendant is estopped to say the contrary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hungerford v. Thompson, 1 Kirby 393 (Colo. Ct. App. 1788).

1 Kirby 393 (Hungerford v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.