Hungerford v. Thompson

1 Kirby 393
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1788
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 393 (Hungerford v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hungerford v. Thompson, 1 Kirby 393 (Colo. Ct. App. 1788).

Opinion

By the Court.

The defendant’s setting his name to the blank on the back of the note, was, according to the nature of the transaction, and the course of business, an authority to the plaintiff to write over it a power of attorney, or an assignment with warranty, at his election; and the defendant is estopped to say the contrary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Kirby 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hungerford-v-thompson-connsuperct-1788.