Hungerford v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Hungerford v. State

924 N.E.2d 843, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1539

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 14, 2010·No. 2010-0291·Published

Opinion

Lake App. No. 2008-L-073, 2009-Ohio-6997. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I-IV, VII, IX, and X; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. X. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V, VI, and VIII. O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake App. No. 2008-L-073, 2009-Ohio-6997. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I-IV, VII, IX, and X; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. X. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V, VI, and VIII. O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Hungerford v. State, 924 N.E.2d 843, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1539 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

924 N.E.2d 843 (Hungerford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related