Hungarian General Credit-Bank v. Titus

175 A.D. 506, 161 N.Y.S. 1077, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8368
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hungarian General Credit-Bank v. Titus. Read the opinion of the Court — 175 A.D. 507

Opinion

Smith, J.:

By agreement of counsel the question involved upon this appeal is identical with that involved in another appeal in the same case from an order denying a motion to compel the plaintiff to reply to an amended answer (175 App. Div. 504). [507]*507For like reason as therein stated the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs.

Clarke, P. J., Scott, Page and Davis, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hungarian General Credit-Bank v. Titus, 175 A.D. 506, 161 N.Y.S. 1077, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

175 A.D. 506 (Hungarian General Credit-Bank v. Titus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hungarian General Credit-Bank v. Titus
175 A.D. 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)