Hung Pin Lee and Daniel R. Kirshbaum, P.C. v. Xenos Yuen and the Law Offices of Yuen & Associates, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hung Pin Lee and Daniel R. Kirshbaum, P.C. v. Xenos Yuen and the Law Offices of Yuen & Associates, P.C.

DecidedNovember 23, 2010

Docket14-10-00848-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Hung Pin Lee and Daniel R. Kirshbaum, P.C. v. Xenos Yuen and the Law Offices of Yuen & Associates, P.C. (Hung Pin Lee and Daniel R. Kirshbaum, P.C. v. Xenos Yuen and the Law Offices of Yuen & Associates, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hung Pin Lee and Daniel R. Kirshbaum, P.C. v. Xenos Yuen and the Law Offices of Yuen & Associates, P.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 23, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00848-CV

HUNG PIN LEE AND DANIEL R. KIRSHBAUM, P.C., Appellants

V.

XENOS YUEN AND THE LAW OFFICES OF YUEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Appellees

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-03203

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 13, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed August 30, 2010. To date, our records show that appellants have neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

On October 14, 2010, this court ordered appellants to pay the appellate filing fee on or before October 25, 2010, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellants have not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 23, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00848-CV

HUNG PIN LEE AND DANIEL R. KIRSHBAUM, P.C., Appellants

V.

XENOS YUEN AND THE LAW OFFICES OF YUEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Appellees

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-03203

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 13, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed August 30, 2010. To date, our records show that appellants have neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

On October 14, 2010, this court ordered appellants to pay the appellate filing fee on or before October 25, 2010, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellants have not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hung Pin Lee and Daniel R. Kirshbaum, P.C. v. Xenos Yuen and the Law Offices of Yuen & Associates, P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hung-pin-lee-and-daniel-r-kirshbaum-pc-v-xenos-yue-texapp-2010.