Hung Chin Ching v. Fook Hing Tong, Chong Hing Tenn and Kui Hing Tenn
This text of 191 F.2d 857 (Hung Chin Ching v. Fook Hing Tong, Chong Hing Tenn and Kui Hing Tenn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
191 F.2d 857
HUNG CHIN CHING, Appellant,
v.
FOOK HING TONG, Chong Hing Tenn and Kui Hing Tenn, Appellees.
No. 12784.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
October 24, 1951.
Appeal from the Supreme Court for the Territory of Hawaii.
Shiro Kashiwa, Honolulu, T. H., for appellant.
J. Garner Anthony, Thomas M. Waddoups, Frank D. Padgett, all of Honolulu, T. H. (Robertson, Castle & Anthony, Honolulu, T. H., of counsel), for appellees.
Before STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and McCORMICK, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed. See opinion and Findings of Fact of Supreme Court of Hawaii, filed August 18, 1950, 38 Haw. 616.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 F.2d 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hung-chin-ching-v-fook-hing-tong-chong-hing-tenn-a-ca9-1951.