Hundley v. Revish

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6542

JAMES J. HUNDLEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RONALD REVISH, Probation Officer; AARON SUMPTER, Probation Officer; JOHN DOE, District Supervisor,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00068-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James J. Hundley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James J. Hundley appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Hundley v. Revish, No. 1:10-cv-

00068-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 31, 2010; entered Apr. 1,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED