Hundley v. City of Huntsville

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hundley v. City of Huntsville

126 So. 616, 23 Ala. App. 451, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 76

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 4, 1930

Docket8 Div. 867.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 So. 616 (Hundley v. City of Huntsville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hundley v. City of Huntsville, 126 So. 616, 23 Ala. App. 451, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 76 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was charged with the violation of a city ordinance, and, on judgment being rendered against him in the circuit court on appeal from the recorder’s court, he appeals.

This is a quasi criminal cause, in which assignments of error must conform to rule 1 of the Supreme Court. There is no such conformity, and the judgment is affirmed. Childs v. City of Birmingham, 19 Ala. App. 71, 94 So. 790; Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was charged with the violation of a city ordinance, and, on judgment being rendered against him in the circuit court on appeal from the recorder’s court, he appeals.

This is a quasi criminal cause, in which assignments of error must conform to rule 1 of the Supreme Court. There is no such conformity, and the judgment is affirmed. Childs v. City of Birmingham, 19 Ala. App. 71, 94 So. 790; Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 So. 616, 23 Ala. App. 451, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hundley-v-city-of-huntsville-alactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack