Hundhausen v. State

747 So. 2d 464, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17273, 1999 WL 1259012
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 29, 1999
DocketNo. 98-03530
StatusPublished

This text of 747 So. 2d 464 (Hundhausen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hundhausen v. State, 747 So. 2d 464, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17273, 1999 WL 1259012 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Appellant, Larry G. Hundhausen, appeals from his judgment and sentence entered upon the revocation of his probation. Appellant argues that his admission to the probation violation was not made knowingly. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction because appellant failed to preserve his right to appeal any legally dis-positive issue as required by section 924.051(4), Florida Statutes (1997). See Benelhocine v. State, 717 So.2d 104 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (dismissing appeal due to defendant’s failure to preserve his right to appeal). This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant to seek relief from the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850.

Dismissed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benelhocine v. State
717 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
747 So. 2d 464, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17273, 1999 WL 1259012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hundhausen-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.