Hunden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hunden v. State

142 Tex. Crim. 325

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 1941·No. No. 21673·Published

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was duly convicted of the offense of burglary by a jury in Gregg County.

The indictment sets out a number of previous offenses as a proper basis for alleging that appellant was an habitual criminal. The jury returned its verdict finding him guilty on the second count of the indictment and judgment was entered assessing his punishment as life imprisonment.

[326]*326The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception. The procedure appears to' be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was duly convicted of the offense of burglary by a jury in Gregg County.

The indictment sets out a number of previous offenses as a proper basis for alleging that appellant was an habitual criminal. The jury returned its verdict finding him guilty on the second count of the indictment and judgment was entered assessing his punishment as life imprisonment.

[326]*326The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception. The procedure appears to' be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Hunden v. State, 142 Tex. Crim. 325 (Tex. 1941).

Pincite

142 Tex. Crim. 325 (Hunden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.