Hund v. Behringer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hund v. Behringer

173 A.D. 999, 159 N.Y.S. 1119

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

—Judgment of Supreme Court and judgment of City Court reversed, with costs to appellant to abide event, and a new trial granted, to be had in the City Court on the 1st day of June, 1916, at 10 A. m. Held, that the weight of the evidence shows that the plaintiffs waived or estopped themselves from any claim of commissions. AR concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and De AngeRs, J., who dissented and voted for affirmance. (See Winans v. Jaques, 10 Daly, 487; Travis v. Bowron, 188 App. Div. 554.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment of Supreme Court and judgment of City Court reversed, with costs to appellant to abide event, and a new trial granted, to be had in the City Court on the 1st day of June, 1916, at 10 A. m. Held, that the weight of the evidence shows that the plaintiffs waived or estopped themselves from any claim of commissions. AR concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and De AngeRs, J., who dissented and voted for affirmance. (See Winans v. Jaques, 10 Daly, 487; Travis v. Bowron, 188 App. Div. 554.)

Hund v. Behringer, 173 A.D. 999, 159 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

173 A.D. 999 (Hund v. Behringer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related