Hund v. Behringer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hund v. Behringer

173 A.D. 999, 159 N.Y.S. 1119

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.D. 999 (Hund v. Behringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hund v. Behringer, 173 A.D. 999, 159 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment of Supreme Court and judgment of City Court reversed, with costs to appellant to abide event, and a new trial granted, to be had in the City Court on the 1st day of June, 1916, at 10 A. m. Held, that the weight of the evidence shows that the plaintiffs waived or estopped themselves from any claim of commissions. AR concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and De AngeRs, J., who dissented and voted for affirmance. (See Winans v. Jaques, 10 Daly, 487; Travis v. Bowron, 188 App. Div. 554.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment of Supreme Court and judgment of City Court reversed, with costs to appellant to abide event, and a new trial granted, to be had in the City Court on the 1st day of June, 1916, at 10 A. m. Held, that the weight of the evidence shows that the plaintiffs waived or estopped themselves from any claim of commissions. AR concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and De AngeRs, J., who dissented and voted for affirmance. (See Winans v. Jaques, 10 Daly, 487; Travis v. Bowron, 188 App. Div. 554.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D. 999, 159 N.Y.S. 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hund-v-behringer-nyappdiv-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack