Hunau v. Model Brassiere Corp

Second Circuit

Hunau v. Model Brassiere Corp

200 F.2d 604

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 19, 1952

Docket22508

StatusPublished

This text of 200 F.2d 604 (Hunau v. Model Brassiere Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunau v. Model Brassiere Corp, 200 F.2d 604 (2d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

200 F.2d 604

HUNAU
v.
MODEL BRASSIERE CORP.

No. 113.

Docket 22508.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued December 5, 1952.

Decided December 19, 1952.

W. Lee Helms, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Armand E. Lackenbach, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff's patent was found to be invalid because anticipated by prior patents and for lack of invention. The decision was correct and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

200 F.2d 604

HUNAU
v.
MODEL BRASSIERE CORP.

No. 113.

Docket 22508.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued December 5, 1952.

Decided December 19, 1952.

W. Lee Helms, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Armand E. Lackenbach, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff's patent was found to be invalid because anticipated by prior patents and for lack of invention. The decision was correct and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 F.2d 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunau-v-model-brassiere-corp-ca2-1952.