Humphries v. Wilson
This text of 2 Del. Ch. 331 (Humphries v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I cannot do otherwise than conclude, upon examination of the evidence and papers in this cause, that the conveyance of the houses and lot by [333]*333James C. Wilson to his sister Susanna was voluntary, and was designed to avoid payment of the balance of Humphries’ claim for building the houses, which was then contested and ivas in litigation. The time and manner of the conveyance and the insufficient proof of payment of the purchase money alike lead to this conclusion ; and the confession by Wilson of a large judgment to Riley, when but little or nothing was due to him, and even without his-knowledge, points to the same conclusion, as having the same object. Equity will not allow this. Humphries’ claim for the building is now legally ascertained, and this property is equitably bound for it. I shall, therefore, decree that the deed be set aside as against Humphries’ judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Del. Ch. 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphries-v-wilson-delch-1865.