Humphries v. Nix

77 Ga. 98
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 20, 1886·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Jackson, Chief Justice.

An instrument which has, at the end of the note, the words “ signed and sealed,” followed by the signature and the scroll for a seal with “L. S.” written across it, is equivalent to (he words, “ witness my hand and seal,” followed in the same way, and is a compliance with the statute, Code, §2915, which enacts that “no instrument shall be considered under seal, unless so recited in the body of the instrument.” “ Signed and sealed” are as much in the body of the instrument as “ witness my hand and seal” in [99]*99the same place in the note is. That the last named words in that place are sufficient if followed by the representation of the seal, see 72 Ga. 898; Willhelms vs. Partoine and 69 Ga. 762, Brooks vs. M. C. & J. F. Kiser.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Humphries v. Nix, 77 Ga. 98 (Ga. 1886).

77 Ga. 98 (Humphries v. Nix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chastain v. L. Moss Music Co.
64 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Scott v. Gaulding
3 S.E.2d 766 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Crosby v. Burkhalter
179 S.E. 180 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Smith v. Downing Co.
95 S.E. 19 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Waterman v. Barclay
72 S.E. 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Anderson v. Peteet
64 S.E. 284 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Barnes v. Walker & Co.
41 S.E. 243 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Echols v. Phillips
37 S.E. 977 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Ridley v. Hightower
37 S.E. 733 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)