Humphries v. Button

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 * * *

4 SAGE HUMPHRIES, GINA MENICHINO, Case No. 2:21-cv-01412-ART-EJY ROSEMARIE DeANGELO, DANIELLE 5 GUTIERREZ, JANE DOE 100, JULIET DOHERTY, and JANE DOE 200 6 ORDER Plaintiffs, 7 v. 8 MITCHELL TAYLOR BUTTON and DUSTY 9 BUTTON,

10 Defendants.

11 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal (ECF No. 293) filed in response to the 13 Court’s Order at ECF No. 289 finding the entirety of a document Plaintiffs sought to seal was not 14 properly sealed. Since that date Plaintiffs filed a redacted version of the document on publicly 15 available docket. ECF No. 292. Plaintiff have also refiled an unredacted version of the document 16 under seal. ECF No. 294. The redactions Plaintiffs seek meet the applicable good cause requirement 17 established in Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). 18 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal (ECF No. 293) is 19 GRANTED. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibit A filed at ECF No. 294 is and shall remain sealed. 21 DATED this 3rd day of November, 2023.

23 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27