Humphreys v. Schlenk

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 386
Ohio Circuit Courts·Decided June 26, 1909·Published

Opinion

SWING, J.

This is a question as to priority of liens. Schlenk’s judgment is prior in time and is a lien on the lands in controversy, but not having been levied on the lands of the debtor within one year from the time of the rendition of the judgment under the provisions of R. S. 5415 (Gen. Code 11708, 11709), it lost its priority to the judgment of Humphrey’s, which was rendered subsequent and which was levied on the lands in question. Earnfit v. Winans, 3 Ohio 135, 136; Corwin v. Benham, 2 Ohio St. 36; Bish v. Burns, 4 Circ. Dec. 598 (7 R. 285).

Giffen and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Humphreys v. Schlenk, 22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 386 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 386 (Humphreys v. Schlenk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earnfit v. Winans
3 Ohio 135 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1827)