Humphrey v. State
262 S.W.3d 687, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1222, 2008 WL 4134096
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Humphrey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1560 →
Opinion
ORDER
Donald Humphrey appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in finding that Humphrey’s counsel was not ineffective in failing to object to admission of an informant’s out-of-court statement.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Humphrey v. State, 262 S.W.3d 687, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1222, 2008 WL 4134096 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
262 S.W.3d 687 (Humphrey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
G.H.H. Investments, L.L.C. v. Chesterfield Management Associates, L.P.
262 S.W.3d 687 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)