Humphrey v. State

958 So. 2d 997, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8158, 2007 WL 1514645
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 2007·No. No. 5D07-371·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Appellant’s motion for posteonvietion relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. However, in our review of this matter, we note that although the appropriate minimum mandatory sentences were pronounced at the time of Appellant’s sentencing, the written sentencing documents as to counts 1, 4 and 5 failed to reflect that fact. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court with directions that the sentencing documents be corrected to accurately reflect the minimum mandatory sentences orally pronounced. Because this is merely a clerical matter, Appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Humphrey v. State, 958 So. 2d 997, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8158, 2007 WL 1514645 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

958 So. 2d 997 (Humphrey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adderly v. State
958 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)