Humphrey v. State
833 So. 2d 278, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19224, 2002 WL 31875216
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Humphrey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 133 →
Opinion
Marshall A. Humphrey challenges the sentence imposed upon revocation of his probation. Humphrey argues, and the State properly concedes, that the trial court erred in not granting Humphrey credit against his sentence for all the time he previously served, as required by Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). Therefore, we reverse Humphrey’s sentence and remand for resentencing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Humphrey v. State, 833 So. 2d 278, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19224, 2002 WL 31875216 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
833 So. 2d 278 (Humphrey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tripp v. State
622 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)