Humphrey v. Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority

West Virginia Court of Claims

Humphrey v. Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority

20 Ct. Cl. 139

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 27, 1995

DocketCC-94-825

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ct. Cl. 139 (Humphrey v. Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Humphrey v. Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority, 20 Ct. Cl. 139 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks reimbursement of $79.00 for broken eye glasses. The eye glasses were broken in the line of duty while restraining an inmate at the South Central Regional Jail, a facility of respondent. The fiscal year ended before the request for reimbursement could be paid, therefore claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, respondent admits the validity and amount of t he claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which claimant could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $79.00.

Award of $79.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks reimbursement of $79.00 for broken eye glasses. The eye glasses were broken in the line of duty while restraining an inmate at the South Central Regional Jail, a facility of respondent. The fiscal year ended before the request for reimbursement could be paid, therefore claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, respondent admits the validity and amount of t he claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which claimant could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $79.00.

Award of $79.00.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ct. Cl. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphrey-v-regional-jail-correctional-facility-authority-wvctcl-1995.