Humphrey v. Humphrey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Humphrey v. Humphrey

423 S.W.3d 846, 2014 WL 840065, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 231

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 2014·No. No. ED 99665·Published

Opinion

[847] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall S. Humphrey (Husband) appeals the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Connie S. Humphrey (Wife) and dividing the marital property. Husband claims the trial court erred by awarding a disproportionately greater share of the marital property to Wife, resulting in an unjust property division. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[847] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall S. Humphrey (Husband) appeals the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Connie S. Humphrey (Wife) and dividing the marital property. Husband claims the trial court erred by awarding a disproportionately greater share of the marital property to Wife, resulting in an unjust property division. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Humphrey v. Humphrey, 423 S.W.3d 846, 2014 WL 840065, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 231 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

423 S.W.3d 846 (Humphrey v. Humphrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.