Humphrey v. Horton
This text of Humphrey v. Horton (Humphrey v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PELE ERUSILCALLY FILED pore: —_ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT |DATE FILED: { 2/70 □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ceed □□□□□□□□□□ | eww ee ee □□ eR RP Pe eee eee eee HK MICHAEL HUMPHREY Plaintiffs, -against- 24-cy-9369 (LAK) RICKY D.HORTON, et ano., Defendants RR RR □□ ee eee ee ee RR KK
ORDER
LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, The notice of g removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: iy The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). (@ — The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability companies, See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before December 17, 2024 of an notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 10, 2024 /; Vy, Lewis A. Kapla United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Humphrey v. Horton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphrey-v-horton-nysd-2024.