Humphrey v. Hendrick

88 S.W.2d 777
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 30, 1935
DocketNo. 11845.
StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.W.2d 777 (Humphrey v. Hendrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Humphrey v. Hendrick, 88 S.W.2d 777 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

BOND, Justice.

This case is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court of Dallas county, changing the venue of the case, on the judge’s own motion, ..to Montgomery county, Tex., and directing the clerk of the district court of Dallas county to transmit the original papers and copies of all orders made therein to that county.

In an original proceedings this day decided by this court, the appellant applied for writs of mandamus, wherein he challenges the validity of the transfer order involved in this appeal. In the opinion, Humphrey v. Rawlins et al., 88 S.W.(2d) 776, this day decided, the transfer ordet is held to be null and void, and, in law, the case still remains on the docket of the Dallas county district court. In the cited 'case, the Dallas court was directed to redocket the cause and proceed in due order with the trial, therefore, perforce of the action of the appellant, having elected to apply for the remedy by mandamus, which, clearly, was available to him; and the resultant order of this court, amounting to a final adjudication of the matters here involved, is an abandonment of this appeal. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Humphrey v. Rawlins
88 S.W.2d 776 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.W.2d 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphrey-v-hendrick-texapp-1935.