Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

953 A.2d 653, 288 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 315
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJuly 9, 2008
Docket18181
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 953 A.2d 653 (Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., 953 A.2d 653, 288 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 315 (Colo. 2008).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 796 (AC 28914), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*909 James R. Fogarty, in support of the petition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to apply the mode of operation rule as articulated in Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 806 A.2d 546, cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912, 810 A.2d 278 (2002), to this slip and fall case?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18181.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
993 A.2d 449 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
953 A.2d 653, 288 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphrey-v-great-atlantic-and-pacific-tea-company-inc-conn-2008.