Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

953 A.2d 653, 288 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 315

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 9, 2008·No. 18181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 796 (AC 28914), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*909 James R. Fogarty, in support of the petition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to apply the mode of operation rule as articulated in Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 806 A.2d 546, cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912, 810 A.2d 278 (2002), to this slip and fall case?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18181.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 796 (AC 28914), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*909 James R. Fogarty, in support of the petition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to apply the mode of operation rule as articulated in Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 806 A.2d 546, cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912, 810 A.2d 278 (2002), to this slip and fall case?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18181.

Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., 953 A.2d 653, 288 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 315 (Colo. 2008).

Pincite

953 A.2d 653 (Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related