Humphrey v. Gansevoort
2 How. Pr. 123
This text of 2 How. Pr. 123 (Humphrey v. Gansevoort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Humphrey v. Gansevoort, 2 How. Pr. 123 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
Opinion
Ho reasons are shown why twenty witnesses are necessary for defendant. Plaintiffs show why 1 three are necessary for them; the venue must be retained.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphrey-v-gansevoort-nysupct-1846.