Humphrey v. Eakeley
65 A. 1118, 74 N.J.L. 599, 45 Vroom 599, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 174
Opinion
The judgment brought here by this writ óf error is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court, reported in 43 Vroom 425.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Eeed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Humphrey v. Eakeley, 65 A. 1118, 74 N.J.L. 599, 45 Vroom 599, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 174 (N.J. 1907).
65 A. 1118 (Humphrey v. Eakeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Better Home Furniture Co. of Winston-Salem v. Baron
91 S.E.2d 236 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)