Humphrey v. Cande
2 Cow. 509
This text of 2 Cow. 509 (Humphrey v. Cande) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Humphrey v. Cande, 2 Cow. 509 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
Opinion
The objection is fatal. There is no such cause in existence, as the one mentioned in the title ; and such an affidavit is never received. The party cannot be. convicted of perjury though he swear falsely. We refuse to hear motions for writs of mandamus upon affidavits which are entitled, and. the same rule prevails in the King’s Bench as to affidavits to hold to bail.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Burleigh v. Sartain
176 A. 169 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)
Kulich v. Kertacy
174 A. 503 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934)
Sterrick v. Pugsley
22 F. Cas. 1313 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1874)
Blake Crusher Co. v. Ward
3 F. Cas. 615 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1874)
Kearney v. Andrews
5 Wis. 23 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1856)
Castle v. Matthews
1 Hill & Den. 438 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cow. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphrey-v-cande-nysupct-1824.