Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 385, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1789

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 28, 1965

DocketNo. 69426; protests 62/6485, etc. (Tampa)

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Cust. Ct. 385 (Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 385, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1789 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of galvanized steel tubes, not less than 0.065 of an inch in thickness and % of an inch in diameter, which are either lab-welded, butt-welded, seamed, or jointed, and that the issue is similar in all material respects to that involved in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, except as to certain items which were abandoned and, accordingly, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of galvanized steel tubes, not less than 0.065 of an inch in thickness and % of an inch in diameter, which are either lab-welded, butt-welded, seamed, or jointed, and that the issue is similar in all material respects to that involved in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, except as to certain items which were abandoned and, accordingly, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Cust. Ct. 385, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphrey-macgregor-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack