Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 385, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1789
United States Customs Court·Decided June 28, 1965·No. No. 69426; protests 62/6485, etc. (Tampa)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of galvanized steel tubes, not less than 0.065 of an inch in thickness and % of an inch in diameter, which are either lab-welded, butt-welded, seamed, or jointed, and that the issue is similar in all material respects to that involved in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, except as to certain items which were abandoned and, accordingly, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 385, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1789 (cusc 1965).

55 Cust. Ct. 385 (Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amerlux Steel Products Corp. v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)