Hummingway v. United States

170 F. App'x 140
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 2006
DocketNo. 05-5261
StatusPublished

This text of 170 F. App'x 140 (Hummingway v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hummingway v. United States, 170 F. App'x 140 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed May 19, 2005 be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint without prejudice on the ground that it did not comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). See Ciralsky v. CIA 355 F.3d 661, 668-69 (D.C.Cir.2004).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence Agency
355 F.3d 661 (D.C. Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 F. App'x 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hummingway-v-united-states-cadc-2006.