Hummingway v. Bush

D.C. Circuit

Hummingway v. Bush

223 F. App'x 2

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 2007

DocketNo. 06-5395

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 F. App'x 2 (Hummingway v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hummingway v. Bush, 223 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 14, 2006, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint on the ground that it did not comply with the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 8(e)(1). See Ciralsky v. CIA 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004); Karim-Panahi v. U.S. Congress, 105 Fed.Appx. 270, 274 (D.C.Cir. 2004).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 14, 2006, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint on the ground that it did not comply with the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 8(e)(1). See Ciralsky v. CIA 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004); Karim-Panahi v. U.S. Congress, 105 Fed.Appx. 270, 274 (D.C.Cir. 2004).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 F. App'x 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hummingway-v-bush-cadc-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack