Hummingbird Restaurant, Inc. v. Brighton Commons Partnership

171 A.D.2d 1059, 579 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6803
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1991·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from order insofar as it denied plaintiffs motion to vacate order dismissing plaintiff’s causes of action unanimously dismissed as moot (see, Marine Midland Bank v Fisher, 85 AD2d 905) and otherwise order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Johnson & Sons Enters, v Brighton Commons Partnership ([appeal No. 3] 171 AD2d 1059 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Fritsch, J. — Restore to Calendar.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hummingbird Restaurant, Inc. v. Brighton Commons Partnership, 171 A.D.2d 1059, 579 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

171 A.D.2d 1059 (Hummingbird Restaurant, Inc. v. Brighton Commons Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marine Midland Bank v. Fisher
85 A.D.2d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)