Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hummingbird Restaurant, Inc. v. Brighton Commons Partnership

Hummingbird Restaurant, Inc. v. Brighton Commons Partnership

171 A.D.2d 1059, 579 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6803
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 1991
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D.2d 1059 (Hummingbird Restaurant, Inc. v. Brighton Commons Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hummingbird Restaurant, Inc. v. Brighton Commons Partnership, 171 A.D.2d 1059, 579 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Appeal from order insofar as it denied plaintiffs motion to vacate order dismissing plaintiff’s causes of action unanimously dismissed as moot (see, Marine Midland Bank v Fisher, 85 AD2d 905) and otherwise order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Johnson & Sons Enters, v Brighton Commons Partnership ([appeal No. 3] 171 AD2d 1059 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Fritsch, J. — Restore to Calendar.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marine Midland Bank v. Fisher
85 A.D.2d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D.2d 1059, 579 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hummingbird-restaurant-inc-v-brighton-commons-partnership-nyappdiv-1991.