Hummert v. Christison

Montana Supreme Court·Decided September 25, 2020·No. DA 20-0377·Unpublished

Opinion

09/25/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0377

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA F)LED Case No. DA 20-0377 SEP 2 5 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court

State nf Mnntana

)

MICHAEL HUMMERT, ) ORDER HOLDING ) THE TIME REQUIREMENT Plaintiff and Appellant, ) IN ABEYANCE PENDING ) COMPLETION OF THE and ) MANDATORY ALTERNATNE ) DISPUTE RESOLUTION JERRY CHRISTISON, ) PROCESS

Defendant and Appellee.

Upon the Stipulation of the parties to hold the time requirements ofthe Rules of

Appellate Procedure in abeyance pending completion ofthe mandatory appellate alternative

dispute resolution process, or the expiration ofthe 75 day time limit of Rule 7(3)(b) ofthe Rules

of Appellate Procedure and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time requirements for completion ofthe mandatory

appellate alternative dispute resolution process, or the expiration ofthe 75 day time limit of Rule

7(3)(b) ofthe Rules of Appellate Procedure shall be extended.

(1'‘•,

Dated this 2S- day of....i'o? ,2020.

Order Holding the Time Requirement in Abeyance Pending Completion ofthe Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution Process — Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hummert v. Christison, (Mo. 2020).

Hummert v. Christison (Hummert v. Christison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.