Hummell v. Mercier
This text of 190 N.E. 408 (Hummell v. Mercier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and. the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of Wyant v. Russell, 109 Ohio St., 167, for the reason that the record discloses that the Municipal Court of Sandusky rendered judgment as of May 25, 1932, which judgment was entered on the civil docket of that court as required by law and was not vacated, and the limitation for perfecting appeal ran from the judgment of May 25, 1932.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 N.E. 408, 128 Ohio St. 49, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 49, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hummell-v-mercier-ohio-1934.