Hummel v. Stines

127 So. 864, 99 Fla. 857, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 1581
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 21, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the' said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. •

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hummel v. Stines, 127 So. 864, 99 Fla. 857, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 1581 (Fla. 1930).

127 So. 864 (Hummel v. Stines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.