Huminski v. Town of Bennington

111 F. App'x 643
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 5, 2004
DocketNo. 03-7036
StatusPublished

This text of 111 F. App'x 643 (Huminski v. Town of Bennington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huminski v. Town of Bennington, 111 F. App'x 643 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff appeals from a final judgment granting summary judgment for defendants.

Plaintiff argues on appeal that his federal and state constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the laws were violated because of various conflicts of interest in the prosecutor’s office. For the reasons stated by the District Court in its Ruling on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of November 27, 2002, we hold that none of these challenges rise to the level of reversible error.

We have considered all of plaintiff’s claims on appeal and found them to be without merit. We hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 F. App'x 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huminski-v-town-of-bennington-ca2-2004.