Humes v. Wood

25 Mass. 479
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 6, 1829
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Mass. 479 (Humes v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Humes v. Wood, 25 Mass. 479 (Mass. 1829).

Opinion

Parker C. J.

delivered the opinion of the Court. The action cannot be maintained against the executor, because he has no funds out of which to pay the legacy. The personal estate is all consumed by debts and expenses of administration, except the stock, farming utensils, &c. which are specifically devised. The real estate is not charged with the payment of legacies, and besides is also specifically devised. It does not come into the hands of the executor, and he has no authority to sell it. That a devise of a farm or any definite parcel of real estate may be specific, the authorities cited sufficiently show.

It was supposed by the counsel for the plaintiffs, that there being a general residuary devise to those to whom the real estate is given in a preceding clause, this operates as a revocation of the particular devise. But it cannot so operate contrary to the clear intention of the testator, which was, in this residuary clause, to give what might by possibility not have been before disposed of.

Plaintiffs nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Mass. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humes-v-wood-mass-1829.