Humes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Humes v. State

1919 OK CR 200, 180 P. 193, 16 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 134

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 17, 1919

DocketNo. A-3320.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 200 (Humes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Humes v. State, 1919 OK CR 200, 180 P. 193, 16 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 134 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in- error, Ben Humes, was convicted on a charge of vagrancy, and in pursuance of the verdict he was sentenced to toe confined in the county jail, for 15 days and to pay a fine of $25. From the judgment he appealed, toy filing in this court on April 18, 1918. a petition in error with case-made.

His counsel of record has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which motion is sustained, the appeal dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in- error, Ben Humes, was convicted on a charge of vagrancy, and in pursuance of the verdict he was sentenced to toe confined in the county jail, for 15 days and to pay a fine of $25. From the judgment he appealed, toy filing in this court on April 18, 1918. a petition in error with case-made.

His counsel of record has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which motion is sustained, the appeal dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 200, 180 P. 193, 16 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.