Humenn v. Valentine
This text of 263 A.D. 977 (Humenn v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As petitioner has admitted the attempted fraud in his examination, the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, the motion denied and the petition dismissed. (See Matter of Marinick v. Valentine, 263 App. Div. 564, decided simultaneously herewith.)
Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., and Townley, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, the motion denied, and the petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 977, 33 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humenn-v-valentine-nyappdiv-1942.