Home/Third Circuit/Humenik v. Celotex Corp.

Humenik v. Celotex Corp.

908 F.2d 962, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11619, 1990 WL 96234
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 29, 1990
Docket90-1075
StatusPublished

This text of 908 F.2d 962 (Humenik v. Celotex Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Humenik v. Celotex Corp., 908 F.2d 962, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11619, 1990 WL 96234 (3d Cir. 1990).

Opinion

908 F.2d 962

Humenik (Joseph L.)
v.
Celotex Corp., Dana Corp., Eagle Picher Industries, Inc.,
Fibreboard Corp., Flexitallic Gasket, GAF Corp., Garlock
Inc., Keene Corp., National Gypsum, Owens-Corning Fiberglas
Corp., Owens-Illinois Glass, Raymark Industries, Inc.,
Turner & Newall, Ltd., Uniroyal, U.S. Gypsum

NO. 90-1075

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

JUN 29, 1990

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
908 F.2d 962, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11619, 1990 WL 96234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humenik-v-celotex-corp-ca3-1990.